Since the late 1960s the American bourgeois patriarchy has
been experiencing disintegration and transfiguration. According to Vivian
Sobchack in “Bringing It All Back Home: Family Economy and Generic Exchange” a man’s
home in bourgeois patriarchal culture is no longer his castle. His home is influenced
and effected by the outside world. It is no longer possible for Dad to shelter his
family from the influences of the corrupted outside world. The nuclear family
has found itself unable to from social upheavals, many of which have been
initiated by the teenager and by women. From early to mid-1970s the child was
portrayed as cannibalistic, monstrous, murderous, selfish and sexual in
response to the youth movements and drug culture of the time (Sobchack,
144-150). Although in the movie Psycho Norman Bates is in his mid to
late 20s his madness began during his teenage years when he murdered his mother
and her lover in her bed. Norman’s mental development is that of a confused man-child
who’s repressed sexual desires lead to murder. Yet throughout the movie the audience
is convinced of “Mothers” guilt at either being the murder or being the cause
of Norman’s madness. Norman (as the
child) is oppressed and at home and therefore threatens both his immediate family
others that come across his path who have the freedom he does not.
Killers being in the psychosexual grip of their mothers and
fathers are often portrayed in horror films however starting in the late 1970s
we begin to see a shift in the ascription of responsibility for the breakdown
of traditional family relations. According to Sobchack the responsibility has
been shifted from child to parent. One can see in both movies The Brood
and The Shining that the child grows smaller, younger, and less adolescent.
Yet the children, both Candy and Danny, still keep certain supernatural powers
without making them uncanny or wicked. The parents instead become the primary
negative force in the middle-class family (Sobchack, 152).
In The Shining the haunted middle-class family Dad
who was economically, professionally and socially failing is possessed into
attempting to kill his wife and son. Jack Torrance becomes the mad face of
patriarchy. Jack was already feeling patriarchal hatred, fear, and
self-loathing before he even moved into a possessed hotel. Therefore the movie
is attempting to subconsciously hint that since patriarchy is challenged all
men feel the rage of paternal responsibility while being denied the economic
and political benefits of patriarchal power. In The Shining Jack is
powerfully absenting himself but then returns to terrify the family. Throughout
the movie Jack begins to abandons his paternal rights and desires. And yet even
as Jack begins to lose grip with his sanity due to paranormal forces and his own
inner demons audience members like me can’t help but to feel a sense of blame
being put on Jacks wife, Wendy. She is portrayed as a meek, submissive, timid
woman who although bows down to her husbands every whim still undermines him by
being a better parent as well as completing his tasks as the caretaker of the
hotel. In Jacks mind it is Wendy who is the root of all his problems, she is undermining
him as a parent, is a constant reminder of all his failures and she is physically
not good looking enough for him and therefore standing in his way of his entitlement.
One particular scene in which the audience can see the marital
problems between Jack and Wendy is their confrontation in the lobby. 1:14:34 Wendy who has become suspicious of her
husband’s mental state creeps into the lobby clutching a bat (a very masculine
weapon) where she makes the ultimate mistake of looking at the story that Jack
has been working on, to find that he has simply been typing the same sentence over
and over again. Wendy begins to frantically search through the papers in the
hopes of finding actual work. It is then that Jack approaches her from behind
asking her “How do you like it?” in a condensing tone. One can sense the
imbalance of their relationship as he begins to question her. He begins to approach
her aggressively and corners her into the altercation. He asks her what she
would like to talk about, and when she explains that she is worried about their
son’s health he begins to verbally attack her, something that comes very naturally
to him as if it occurs often in their marriage. Although throughout the verbal
abuse his main argument is that Wendy is not taking into consideration his
needs, desires or even his commitment to his employers the core of his rage
(aside from the paranormal influences) seems to be the fact that Wendy realized
his failure at writing. And as he malevolently stalks up the stairs towards
her, he tells her “Wendy, darling, light of my life I am not going to hurt you,
I just want to bash your skull in” and as the scene ends with a wonderful
crunch as Wendy’s bat hits Jacks skull the audience is left with a guilty
feeling because we all know that martial situations like theirs occur all over
the world.
The Brood has certain plot themes that mirror The
Shining, once again we have a dysfunctional family where the parents are
having marital issues and it is effecting the child. However in The Brood the
mother in the family is hard, selfish, strong and mad and she is tearing the
family apart. Once again there is an innocent child involved and is suffering
due to the destruction of the nuclear family. Just like Wendy, Nora is subconsciously
sabotaging her husband, Frank, by being mentally ill and breaking up their
family (Creed, 45). By being away Nora is forcing Frank to complete all the
tasks that a mother would. Giving Candy a bath, taking her to school even
changing her clothes. Frank resents this and yet in order to be a good father cannot
truly complain. The movie attempts to cast Frank as the protagonist and Nora
and the antagonist and is hoping that a cross-gender identification occurs
where the female audience identifies with Frank. In order to this the movie portrays Nora’s character
as alien to our societal beliefs as they can. This is evident in the first and final encounter
between Nora and Frank that the audience witness 1:18:17.
In the scene Frank is portrayed as a loving father who is
doing whatever he can to get his daughter back, even trying to trick his
mentally ill wife into believing that he still loves her. Nora on the other
hand is portrayed as something alien, although she looks lovely in her white
gown she is hiding the monster that she has become. Her body has morphed to be able to produce
children on its own no longer needing a man to produce. Not only does her parthenogenetic
body disgust her husband but her obvious comfort with it does as well, he
nearly gags as she licks the blood off her new broodling. As it becomes clear
to Frank that Nora will do anything to keep her daughter away from him he leaps
on her and strangles her to death while she still holds the bloody body of her brood.
It makes one wonder why he could not simply knock her unconscious? Why did the
Frank have to turn into a killer himself? The implication of the movie is that
without a man, woman can only give birth to a race of mutants and that woman’s
destructive emotions must be kept in check (Creed, 45).
Family dynamics and social changes often effect the plot and
underlying messages of movies. The role of each family member is constantly changing
in horror films but the role of each family member is under equal
transformation in our society today. It will be interesting to see how our
societies new changes will translate into horror movies since we now have different
family lifestyles emerging, such as the single mother, single father, same sex
parents, and polygamous parents.
Work Cited
Creed, Barbara. The Monstrous-feminine: Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge, 1993.
Waller, Gregory A. "Bringing It All Back Home: Family Economy and Generic Exchange." American Horrors: Essays on the Modern American Horror Film. Urbana: U of Illinois, 1987.
No comments:
Post a Comment