What is the Alien in The Thing Really Implying?
Rasif Choudhury
The monster in the film, The
Thing, plays a unique role in conveying messages the movie is attempting to
illustrate to their audiences. The beast can mimic any type of living thing,
and is free to choose when to enter and leave the body it is hosting on. This
quality of the alien demonstrates one of the main critiques the film makes
about society, which was the fact that there was a high level of distrust
within America at the time the film was made. By looking at certain
theories, observers can notice why the alien had been attributed with this
ability to mimic any living thing. This will then allow viewers to understand
how actual historical events leading up to the movie might have played a role in
developing the alien’s unique characteristic.
Before
observing how the alien helps portray one of the movie’s main argument about society,
it is important to know how the alien fulfills its role as a monster. The
ability for the alien to mimic any living form complies with Steven Schneider’s
explanation of the surmounted beliefs theory. Schneider argues that characters
in horror films complete its role as a monster, due to its capability to bring
about the uncanny amongst viewers (Schneider, 170). Schneider depicts Sigmund
Freud’s theory of the uncanny as an idea that we once had in the past, however
overtime those beliefs become alienated through the process of repression
(Schneider, 171). Monsters in horror films are aimed to bring back these
repressed ideas, in order to instill fear amongst the viewers. Schneider
outlines several characteristics monsters need, in order to fulfill its role to
bring about the uncanny amongst viewers. One of these characteristics is our
surmounted belief in the existence of doubles and replicas (Schneider, 183).
The alien in the film fulfills this role, due to its ability to take any shape
or form it desires to become. The alien is not bound to a certain body
structure, and is free to choose what it wants to be. This ability instills
great fear amongst the viewers, due to its unpredictable choice on who it will
attack next. The audience has no certainty on where the alien exactly is
throughout the film.
The alien’s
ability to replicate other people has a larger purpose than just simply
instilling fear onto the audience. The alien serves as an agent to convey one
of the movie’s main messages, which was the fact that there was a high level of
distrust within American society. Events leading up to when this movie was
created in 1982, gives an explanation to why the alien was attributed with this
shape shifting ability. In 1972, the notorious Watergate scandal occurred, and
unraveled the truths about the Nixon Administration’s involvement with the
event (Isserman & Kazin, 274). At this time there was also a release of the
Pentagon Papers, which was a document that specified the United State’s actions
within the Vietnam War (Kutler, 23). There was also the ongoing battle of
global supremacy between Democracy and Communism, and state control over
communist influence within America (Schrecker, 43). These events within American
history were a moment where the public lost complete trust with the government.
There was no way of knowing whom
their friends or enemies were. This greatly exemplifies why the alien in, The Thing, was given its ability to be a
chameleon, and had an omnipotent presence throughout the film. Viewers
would not know where the alien was until it decided to show itself. The alien
could be any of the cast members at anytime throughout the movie. In a way this
goes hand in hand with what was occurring in society at this time. People of
the American society did not know where their enemies were. These enemies could
be their neighbors, represented politicians, or even their own family member. This lack of trust can also be seen within the film. Throughout the film, the men of the army base lose complete trust with one another, and have no idea who to view as a leader. This characteristic of the alien allows it to take on the role of the monster, and instill great fear into the audience.
Works Cited
Isserman, Maurice, and Michael Kazin. America
Divided: The Civil War of the 1960s. 4th ed.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Print.
Kutler, Stanley I.. Watergate: A Brief History
With Documents. 2nd ed. Massachusetts:
Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. Print.
Schneider, Steven. "Monsters as (Uncanny) Metaphors:
Freud, Lakoff, and the Representation of
Monstrosity in Cinematic Horror."
Horror Film Reader. Alain Silver & James
Ursini, eds. Limelight Editions, 2000. 167-187.
Schrecker, Ellen. The Age of McCarthyism: A Brief
History with Documents. 2nd ed. Boston:
Bedford/St. Martin's, 2002. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment